Fresh US economic data is sending a clear but nuanced signal to markets. Inflation pressures are easing, but consumers remain under strain. 

For Bitcoin and the broader crypto market, that mix points to improving macro conditions, tempered by near-term volatility.

Why Inflation Expectations Matter More Than Sentiment

US consumer sentiment edged up to 52.9 in December, slightly higher than November but still nearly 30% lower than a year ago, according to the University of Michigan. 

At the same time, inflation expectations continued to fall. Short-term expectations dropped to 4.2%, while long-term expectations eased to 3.2%.

The University of Michigan consumer sentiment index came in worse than expected at 52.9 in December. pic.twitter.com/yQ79MOBt5R

— Yahoo Finance (@YahooFinance) December 19, 2025

For markets, those inflation expectations matter more than confidence levels.

Consumer sentiment measures how people feel about their finances and the economy. Inflation expectations measure what they think prices will do next. Central banks care far more about the latter.

Falling short- and long-term inflation expectations suggest households believe price pressures are easing and will stay contained. 

That supports the Federal Reserve’s goal of cooling inflation without keeping policy restrictive for too long.

This data follows November’s CPI report, which showed inflation cooling faster than expected. Together, the two reports reinforce the same message: inflation is losing momentum.

Who do you believe:

A. University of Michigan consumer confidence below COVID April 2020 and Lehman September 2008 levels.

B. CPI inflation data, skewed by bogus OER? pic.twitter.com/FFEWj0I7OE

— Lawrence McDonald (@Convertbond) December 19, 2025

What This Means for Interest Rates and Liquidity

Lower inflation expectations reduce the need for high interest rates. Markets tend to respond by pricing in earlier or deeper rate cuts, even if economic growth remains slow.

For risk assets, including crypto, this matters because:

• Lower rates reduce returns on cash and bonds
  
• Real yields tend to fall
  
• Financial conditions gradually loosen

Bitcoin has historically responded more to liquidity conditions than to consumer confidence or economic growth.

Why Weak Confidence Does Not Hurt Crypto as Much

Low consumer confidence reflects cost-of-living pressures, not collapsing demand. People still feel stretched, but they are less worried about prices rising sharply from here.

Crypto markets do not rely on consumer spending in the same way equities do. Instead, they react to:

• Interest rate expectations
  
• Dollar strength
  
• Global liquidity
  

That makes falling inflation expectations supportive for Bitcoin, even when confidence remains weak.

Why Volatility Is Likely to Continue

This environment favors risk assets over time, but not in a straight line.

Weak confidence means growth remains fragile. That keeps markets sensitive to data releases, positioning, and short-term flows. As seen after the CPI report, even bullish macro data can trigger sharp reversals when leverage is high.

For Bitcoin, that typically results in:

• Strong reactions to macro news
  
• Choppy price action
  
• Rallies driven by liquidity rather than conviction
  

Looking Ahead to January 2026

Taken together, the data points to a constructive macro backdrop for crypto heading into early 2026. Inflation pressures are easing, policy constraints are loosening, and liquidity conditions are improving.

At the same time, weak confidence explains why markets remain volatile and prone to sudden selloffs.

The key takeaway is simple: macro conditions are improving for Bitcoin, but price action will continue to be shaped by flows, leverage, and timing rather than optimism alone.

The post Cooling Inflation, Weak Confidence: What the Michigan Consumer Data Means for Bitcoin appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Arthur Hayes has moved 508.647 ETH, worth roughly $1.5 million, to Galaxy Digital, sparking fresh speculation that the crypto veteran may be trimming exposure.

The move is surprising because recently Hayes delivered one of his strongest bullish theses on Ethereum.

Arthur Hayes Ethereum Sell Speculation

On-chain data shows the transfer originated from a wallet linked to Hayes and landed at a Galaxy Digital deposit address. 

Transfers to institutional desks do not always signal an immediate sale. But such movements are commonly associated with liquidity provisioning or over-the-counter execution.

The transaction comes as Ethereum trades just below the psychologically important $3,000 level, following a volatile December marked by ETF outflows and derivatives repositioning.

Despite the move, Hayes still controls more than 4,500 ETH.

So, any selling would represent portfolio management rather than a full exit.

The timing is notable. Only days earlier, Hayes laid out a detailed case for Ethereum’s institutional future, arguing that large financial players have finally accepted the limits of private blockchains.

“You can’t have a private blockchain. You must have a public blockchain for security and real usage.”

Hayes framed stablecoins as the catalyst that makes Ethereum legible to traditional finance. He predicted that banks would increasingly build Web3 infrastructure on Ethereum rather than bespoke ledgers.

“You’re going to see large banks start doing crypto and Web3 using a public blockchain. I think the public blockchain will be Ethereum.”

He acknowledged that privacy remains a sticking point for institutional adoption but argued that the issue will be addressed at the application or Layer-2 level, with Ethereum continuing to anchor security.

“They might build an L2 that has some sort of privacy features… but the substrate, the security layer, is still Ethereum.”

However, market conditions remain mixed. Ethereum has struggled to regain sustained momentum above $3,000 as spot ETH ETFs recorded notable outflows in mid-December, while implied volatility in derivatives markets has compressed. This reflects caution rather than panic. 

At the protocol level, activity continues to migrate toward rollups, keeping transaction costs low but limiting fee capture on Ethereum’s base layer.

Hayes also struck a pragmatic tone on valuation expectations, offering a long-term target rather than a near-term prediction.

“If ETH gets to $20,000, that’s about 50 Ethereum to make a million… by the end of the cycle, by the next presidential election.”

For now, Hayes’ on-chain activity suggests tactical positioning, not a reversal of conviction. His thesis remains intact: Ethereum wins if stablecoins and institutional on-chain finance scale. 

The market, however, may still be waiting for that narrative to fully materialize.

The post Did Arthur Hayes Just Sell $1.5 Million in Ethereum? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

David Sacks, the White House’s AI and crypto czar, said the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act) will enter the US Senate markup stage in January, marking a critical step toward final passage.

Sacks said Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott and Senate Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman have confirmed the timeline, setting the stage for formal review and amendments before a full Senate vote.

We had a great call today with Chairmen @SenatorTimScott and @JohnBoozman who confirmed that a markup for Clarity is coming in January. Thanks to their leadership, as well as @RepFrenchHill and @CongressmanGT in the House, we are closer than ever to passing the landmark crypto…

— David Sacks (@davidsacks47) December 18, 2025

What Happens in January

The update signals growing momentum behind the bill after the House advanced it earlier in 2025. 

If the Senate process stays on schedule, lawmakers could finalize a reconciled version later in the year. This will position the CLARITY Act as the central market-structure law for US crypto markets.

During markup, Senate committees will review the House-passed text line by line. Lawmakers will propose amendments, debate policy trade-offs, and vote on changes before sending a revised bill to the Senate floor. 

The process will involve both the Banking Committee, which oversees securities regulation, and the Agriculture Committee, which supervises the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

🚨 The $CLARITY Act — the U.S. $crypto market structure bill — has been delayed until 2026 as Senate action stalls. This means federal regulatory clarity for digital #assets won’t happen this year, keeping the industry in limbo 📉

No law = more uncertainty
More delay = more… pic.twitter.com/gpuUTMQGUU

— COACHTY (@TheRealTRTalks) December 18, 2025

The goal is to resolve long-standing jurisdictional disputes between the SEC and the CFTC and to strengthen guardrails for spot crypto markets. 

Committee leaders have indicated they want a bill that can attract bipartisan support and avoid reopening enforcement-heavy approaches.

Likely Amendment Focus for the CLARITY Act

Amendments are expected to concentrate on three areas. 

First, asset classification, including tighter criteria for determining when a token qualifies as a digital commodity versus a security. 

Also, investor and consumer protections, such as disclosures, custody standards, and conflict-of-interest rules for exchanges and brokers. 

Lastly, implementation timelines, including how quickly platforms must register and how agencies coordinate supervision during the transition.

Senators may also refine preemption language to limit overlapping state rules without weakening state enforcement authority.

After years of talk, the CLARITY Act now has a real path forward.

The White House and key Senators have finally agreed to move the bill, and they’ve put an actual date on it.

January 2026 is when the Senate plans to formally debate it, amend it, and try to push it toward… https://t.co/Uq9BIOQGLx pic.twitter.com/251ij1zE5i

— Milk Road (@MilkRoad) December 18, 2025

How will the CLARITY Act Change US Crypto Markets in 2026?

If enacted, the CLARITY Act would reshape the US crypto market in 2026. It would place spot digital commodity markets under CFTC oversight, end years of regulatory ambiguity, and create a federal registration regime for exchanges, brokers, and dealers. 

For the industry, this would reduce legal uncertainty, support institutional participation, and shift compliance from courtroom battles to rule-based supervision.

For regulators, the law would replace fragmented enforcement with clearer mandates. 

Most importantly, for the market, it would mark the United States’ first comprehensive framework for crypto trading. This would potentially restore competitiveness with jurisdictions that already offer regulatory clarity.

The post US Crypto CLARITY Act Set for Senate Markup in January appeared first on BeInCrypto.

US inflation delivered its biggest downside surprise in months. Yet instead of a sustained rally, both Bitcoin and US equities sold off sharply during US trading hours. 

The price action puzzled many traders, but the charts point to a familiar explanation rooted in market structure, positioning, and liquidity rather than macro fundamentals.

What Happened After the US CPI Release

Headline CPI slowed to 2.7% year over year in November, well below the 3.1% forecast. Core CPI also undershot expectations at 2.6%. 

On paper, this was one of the most risk-positive inflation prints of 2025. Markets initially reacted as expected. Bitcoin jumped toward the $89,000 area, while the S&P 500 spiked higher shortly after the data hit.

That rally did not last.

Within roughly 30 minutes of the CPI print, Bitcoin reversed sharply. After tagging intraday highs near $89,200, BTC sold off aggressively, sliding toward the $85,000 area. 

The S&P 500 followed a similar path, with sharp intraday swings that erased much of the initial CPI-driven gains before stabilizing.

This synchronized reversal across crypto and equities matters. It signals that the move was not asset-specific or sentiment-driven. It was structural.

Bitcoin Taker Sell Volume Tells the Story

The clearest clue comes from Bitcoin’s taker sell volume data.

On the intraday chart, large spikes in taker sell volume appeared precisely as Bitcoin broke lower. Taker sells reflect market orders hitting the bid — aggressive selling, not passive profit-taking. 

These spikes clustered during US market hours and coincided with the fastest part of the decline.

The weekly view reinforces this pattern. Similar sell-side bursts appeared multiple times over the past week, often during high-liquidity windows, suggesting repeated episodes of forced or systematic selling rather than isolated retail exits.

This behavior is consistent with liquidation cascades, volatility-targeting strategies, and algorithmic de-risking — all of which accelerate once price starts moving against leveraged positions.

Why ‘Good News’ Became the Trigger

The CPI report did not cause the selloff because it was bad. It caused volatility because it was good.

Softer inflation briefly increased liquidity and tightened spreads. That environment allows large players to execute size efficiently. 

Bitcoin’s initial spike likely ran into a dense zone of resting orders, stop losses, and short-term leverage. Once upside momentum stalled, price reversed, triggering long liquidations and stop-outs.

As liquidations hit, forced market selling amplified the move. This is why the decline accelerated rather than unfolded gradually.

The S&P 500’s intraday whipsaw shows a similar dynamic. Rapid downside and recovery patterns during macro releases often reflect dealer hedging, options gamma effects, and systematic flows adjusting risk in real time.

🚨 This is insane level of manipulation.

8:30 a.m.

CPI came in lower than expected.

– On the bullish CPI news, Bitcoin pumped $2217, from $87,260 to $89,477 in just 60 minutes.
– $70B added to the crypto market.
– $94 million worth of shorts liquidated.

10:00 a.m.

The… pic.twitter.com/FmJqLDKbBw

— Bull Theory (@BullTheoryio) December 18, 2025

Does This Look Like Manipulation?

The charts do not prove manipulation. But they show patterns commonly associated with stop-runs and liquidity extraction:

• Fast moves into obvious technical levels
  
• Reversals immediately after liquidity improves
  
• Large bursts of aggressive selling during breakdowns
  
• Tight alignment with US trading hours

These behaviors are typical in highly leveraged markets. The most likely drivers are not individuals, but large funds, market makers, and systematic strategies operating across futures, options, and spot markets. Their goal is not narrative control, but execution efficiency and risk management.

In crypto, where leverage remains high and liquidity thins quickly outside key windows, these flows can look extreme.

🚨 THEY ARE MANIPULATING BITCOIN AGAIN AND I HAVE EVIDENCE!!!

Bitcoin dumped $4000 in minutes…

and almost no one actually understands what just took place.

It’s the same group of players manipulating the price… AGAIN.

Stop looking at charts, YOU NEED TO CHECK THE OUTFLOWS.… pic.twitter.com/ymU4kXdWvb

— NoLimit (@NoLimitGains) December 18, 2025

What This Means Going Forward

The selloff does not invalidate the CPI signal. Inflation genuinely cooled, and that remains supportive for risk assets over time. What the market experienced was a short-term positioning reset, not a macro reversal.

In the near term, traders will watch whether Bitcoin can stabilize above recent support and whether sell-side pressure fades as liquidations clear. 

If taker sell volume subsides and price holds, the CPI data may still assert itself over the coming sessions.

The post US Inflation Cooled, So Why Did Bitcoin and Stocks Sell Off? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Fasttoken (FTN), the native token of the Fastex ecosystem, surged nearly 200% on December 18, sharply outperforming the broader crypto market, which remained largely in the red.

FTN jumped from around $0.37 to above $1.30 within 24 hours, making it one of the day’s top-performing cryptocurrencies. The rally occurred without any major announcement, pointing to a technical and sentiment-driven move rather than a fundamental revaluation.

What Is Fasttoken (FTN)?

Fasttoken is the utility token of the Fastex ecosystem, developed by SoftConstruct. It powers the Bahamut blockchain, an EVM-compatible Layer-1 network that uses a Proof-of-Stake and Activity (PoSA) consensus model.

FTN is used for transaction fees and staking on Bahamut, payments via Fastex Pay, trading on the Fastex exchange, and NFTs, gaming, and other Web3 applications within the ecosystem

SoftConstruct, Fastex’s parent company, operates across payments, gaming, and IT infrastructure, giving FTN exposure beyond a single product line.

A Difficult 2025 for FTN

The sharp rally follows a brutal decline throughout 2025.

Earlier this year, FTN traded above $2.00, but steadily sold off as:

• Large token unlocks entered circulation
  
• Risk-off sentiment dominated altcoins
  
• Exchanges issued warnings, including MEXC’s “Special Treatment” label

By mid-December, FTN had lost over 90% of its value, briefly touching all-time lows between $0.25 and $0.37. Many traders had written the token off.

Why is Fasttoken Rallying Today?

There was no single catalyst behind FTN’s sudden surge. Instead, several factors likely combined to trigger the move.

FTN’s prolonged sell-off created deeply oversold conditions. As the token hit all-time lows, buyers stepped in looking for a short-term recovery play. In thin markets, even moderate buying can lead to outsized price moves.

Fasttoken $FTN is up 216% in the last 24 Hours 😲

For those unaware

-> $FTN is the native crypto of Bahamut, a public EVM-compatible L1 Blockchain
-> The project is developed by SoftConstruct and is part of the Fastex Ecosystem
-> This token painted an upward only chart from… pic.twitter.com/g1QsH0FP0f

— Web3 AjaX 🦅🔥 (@Web3AjaX) December 18, 2025

Earlier this month, concerns emerged after MEXC flagged FTN for potential risk monitoring. By mid-December, no delisting followed. That relief appears to have encouraged traders who were previously sidelined.

FTN trades on a limited number of venues, with liquidity concentrated on a few exchanges. Low liquidity often magnifies volatility, allowing prices to rise rapidly once momentum builds.

The rally also coincided with renewed discussion around Fastex’s broader infrastructure, including Bahamut, Fastex Pay, NFTs, and gaming integrations. While none of these developments were new, they provided narrative support as price momentum accelerated.

✨ Fasttoken ( $FTN ) is flashing some serious warning signs right now.

The chart may look stable on the surface, but the underlying data tells a different story. Liquidity is extremely thin, with only around $3M in total 24h volume across all chains. That’s nowhere near enough… https://t.co/utfR6yfjHz

— Kryptotalker (@kryptotalker) November 20, 2025

No Major Announcement, High Volatility Remains

Despite the sharp gains, there was no official update, partnership, or protocol change announced on December 18. That suggests the rally was driven primarily by technical rebound, market psychology, and short-term speculation.

Most notably, Fasttoken’s X (formerly Twitter) account has been inactive since late-September. 

Fasttoken’s Last X Post Was in September

Analysts caution that such rebounds after steep declines can be volatile. FTN still faces future token unlocks and must show sustained usage growth to support higher valuations.

For now, Fasttoken’s surge stands out as one of the most dramatic moves in an otherwise cautious crypto market—but its durability remains uncertain.

The post Fasttoken Rallies Nearly 200% Despite Bearish Crypto Market appeared first on BeInCrypto.

US inflation slowed more than expected in November, delivering a clear downside surprise that could reshape near-term market and Federal Reserve expectations. According to fresh data released on December 18, the headline Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 2.7% year over year, well below market expectations of 3.1%.

Meanwhile, core CPI, which excludes food and energy, increased 2.6% year over year, also missing forecasts of 3.0%. The data marks a notable deceleration in price pressures and signals that disinflation momentum has strengthened heading into the end of 2025.

Is This Bullish For Crypto Markets?

The softer-than-expected print reinforces the view that inflation is cooling faster than policymakers and markets anticipated just weeks ago. Core inflation, closely watched by the Federal Reserve, now sits well below 3%—a level last seen before inflation reaccelerated earlier this year.

This print weakens the case for prolonged restrictive monetary policy and strengthens expectations that the Fed may turn more accommodative sooner than previously priced in.

Markets are likely to interpret the data as rate-cut supportive, particularly for early 2026. Lower inflation reduces pressure on real yields and the US dollar—two key headwinds for risk assets in recent months.

Risk markets, including equities and crypto, were already positioned cautiously ahead of the release, suggesting room for sharp repricing as traders digest the data.

Bitcoin and the broader crypto market entered the CPI release in consolidation mode, with traders bracing for volatility. A downside inflation surprise typically acts as a macro tailwind for crypto, as easing inflation expectations improve liquidity conditions and risk appetite.

Short-term price action will now depend on how quickly markets reprice Fed policy expectations and whether follow-through buying emerges after the initial reaction.

What comes next? Attention will shift to:

• Updated Fed rate-cut probabilities
• US Treasury yield reactions
• Dollar strength or weakness
• Risk-asset follow-through into year-end

For now, November’s CPI report delivers a clear message: inflation cooled faster than expected, and markets will need to adjust quickly.

The post US Inflation Cools Sharply in November, CPI Misses Forecasts appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Tether’s USDT processed $156 billion in payments of $1,000 or less in 2025, according to figures shared today by CEO Paolo Ardoino, based on Chainalysis and Artemis data. 

The number highlights a side of crypto adoption often missed by price charts and ETF flows – everyday transactional use.

USDT is Being Used as a Substitute for Banks and Cash

Small-value transfers now represent a meaningful share of USDT activity. The data shows steady growth since 2020, with acceleration through 2024 and into 2025, as average daily volumes for sub-$1,000 transfers climbed above $500 million. 

This points to USDT functioning less as a trading instrument and more as a digital payments rail.

The significance lies in who uses stablecoins and how. Transfers under $1,000 typically reflect remittances, payroll, retail payments, savings movement, and peer-to-peer transfers, especially in emerging markets. 

Unlike large exchange flows, these transactions tend to be non-speculative and recurring. 

In practical terms, USDT is increasingly acting as a substitute for cash and bank wires in regions where access to dollars is limited or expensive.

This trend aligns with USDT’s broader trajectory in 2025. Circulating supply reached new highs during the year, reflecting demand for dollar liquidity beyond crypto trading. 

At the same time, regulatory developments reshaped where and how USDT circulates. 

In the US, the GENIUS Act clarified the legal framework for payment stablecoins, reinforcing institutional confidence in compliant dollar-backed tokens. 

In Europe, MiCA introduced stricter licensing rules, shifting some regulated platform activity away from USDT but not slowing global on-chain usage.

Tether has also expanded its infrastructure footprint. Recent investments in Lightning-based payment rails signal an effort to push USDT into faster, lower-cost settlement networks. 

Regional partnerships in Africa and the Middle East further indicate a focus on payments and financial access, not just exchange liquidity.

Taken together, the $156 billion figure reframes the crypto adoption debate. While market cycles drive headlines, stablecoins continue to scale quietly as financial plumbing. 

The growth in small USDT payments suggests that, in 2025, crypto adoption is less about speculation and more about utility, resilience, and global dollar access. This shift may prove more durable than any bull market.

The post Tether’s USDT Payment Stats Show the Real State of Crypto Adoption in 2025 appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Bitcoin experienced an extreme bout of volatility on December 17, surging more than $3,000 in under an hour before reversing sharply and falling back toward $86,000.

The violent swing did not follow any major news. Instead, market data shows the move was driven by leverage, positioning, and fragile liquidity conditions.

A Short Squeeze Pushed Bitcoin Higher

The initial rally began as Bitcoin pushed toward the $90,000 level, a major psychological and technical resistance zone.

Liquidation data shows a dense cluster of leveraged short positions positioned above that level. When price moved higher, those shorts were forced to close. That process requires buying Bitcoin, which pushed prices up even faster.

Roughly $120 million in short positions were liquidated during the spike. This created a classic short squeeze, where forced buying accelerates the move beyond what normal spot demand would justify.

At this stage, the move looked strong. But the structure underneath it was weak.

The Rally Flipped Into A Long Liquidation Cascade

As Bitcoin briefly reclaimed $90,000, new traders entered the market chasing momentum.

Many of those traders opened leveraged long positions, betting the breakout would hold. However, the rally lacked sustained spot buying and quickly stalled.

When the price began to fall, those long positions became vulnerable. Once key support levels broke, exchanges automatically liquidated those positions. More than $200 million in long liquidations followed, overwhelming the market.

Whoever is left

We need to know what happened on October 10

It's VERY apparent that the market broke that day and nothing has been the same since

We haven't seen Bitcoin or Alts trade like this since 2018

We need answers pic.twitter.com/jXe7jwd7RA

— EllioTrades (@elliotrades) December 17, 2025

This second wave explains why the drop was faster and deeper than the initial rise. 

Within hours, Bitcoin had fallen back toward $86,000, erasing most of the gains.

Positioning Data Shows A Fragile Market Setup

Trader positioning data from Binance and OKX helps explain why the move was so violent.

On Binance, the number of top trader accounts leaning long rose sharply ahead of the spike. However, position-size data showed less conviction, suggesting many traders were long but not heavily sized.

On OKX, position-based ratios shifted aggressively after the volatility. That suggests larger traders repositioned quickly, either buying the dip or adjusting hedges as liquidations played out.

This combination — crowded positioning, mixed conviction, and heavy leverage — creates a market that can move violently in both directions with little warning.

Did Market Makers Or Whales Manipulate The Move?

On-chain data showed market makers such as Wintermute moving Bitcoin between exchanges during the volatility. Those transfers coincided with the price swings but do not prove manipulation.

Market makers routinely rebalance inventory during periods of stress. Deposits to exchanges can indicate hedging, margin management, or liquidity provision, not necessarily selling to crash prices.

Importantly, the entire move can be explained by known market mechanics: liquidation clusters, leverage, and thin order books. There is no clear evidence of coordinated manipulation.

What This Means For Bitcoin Going Forward

This episode highlights a key risk in today’s Bitcoin market.

Leverage remains elevated. Liquidity thins quickly during fast moves. When price approaches key levels, forced liquidations can dominate price action.

Bitcoin’s fundamentals did not change during those hours. The swing reflected market structure fragility, not a shift in long-term value.

🚨 BITCOIN IS BEING MANIPULATED, AND I HAVE SOLID PROOF!!!

Everyone’s talking about how Bitcoin went up $3,000 and then down $4,000 in minutes.

Everyone’s posting about it…

but nobody seems to understand what actually happened.

You need to look at the flows, not the chart.… pic.twitter.com/IHCXtx3sUF

— NoLimit (@NoLimitGains) December 17, 2025

Until leverage resets and positioning becomes healthier, similar sharp moves remain possible. In this case, Bitcoin did not rally and crash because of news.

It moved because leverage turned price against itself.

The post Bitcoin Added And Lost Nearly $100 Billion In Hours, What Just Happened? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Caroline Ellison, the former CEO of Alameda Research and a central figure in the FTX scandal, is no longer behind bars. 

US Bureau of Prisons records show Ellison has been transferred from federal prison to Residential Reentry Management (RRM) in New York. This marks a shift from incarceration to community confinement.

What RRM Status Actually Means

According to the Bureau of Prisons inmate locator, Ellison remains in federal custody with a projected release date of February 20, 2026. However, her current status confirms she is no longer housed in a correctional facility.

RRM — short for Residential Reentry Management — oversees the final phase of a federal sentence. Individuals under RRM may be placed in a halfway house or home confinement, rather than a prison. 

While still under Bureau of Prisons supervision, inmates face fewer physical restrictions and may be permitted to work, maintain limited social contact, and prepare for reintegration.

Unlike prison, RRM placements involve no cells, no guards, and significantly more autonomy, though strict monitoring and movement limits remain in place. 

Ellison’s transfer signals she has entered the reentry phase of her sentence, not that she has been released.

Ellison’s Role in the FTX Collapse

Ellison pleaded guilty in 2022 to multiple federal fraud charges tied to the misuse of FTX customer funds. 

As CEO of Alameda Research, the trading arm closely tied to FTX, she admitted to executing trades and financial maneuvers that relied on billions in customer deposits.

However, prosecutors and the court drew a clear distinction between Ellison’s role and that of FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried, who designed the systems that enabled the fraud. Ellison did not control FTX’s exchange infrastructure, customer custody mechanisms, or governance.

Today, SBF's lawyer asked him about his relationship with Caroline Ellison and why it ended. SBF responded by mentioning she wanted more than the time and energy he could give:

"Historically, I haven't been great at … romantic relationships" pic.twitter.com/w19csqFgPr

— Zack Guzmán ♻️ (@zGuz) October 27, 2023

Her cooperation proved decisive. Ellison became the government’s key witness, offering extensive testimony that helped secure Bankman-Fried’s conviction. In 2024, a federal judge sentenced her to two years in prison, citing her cooperation, early guilty plea, and subordinate role.

A Stark Contrast With Do Kwon

Ellison’s move out of prison comes as Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon begins serving a 15-year US federal sentence for fraud linked to the collapse of the TerraUSD stablecoin. 

Prosecutors argued Kwon knowingly misled investors about the stability of Terra’s algorithmic peg, triggering losses estimated at over $40 billion.

4:04 pm- they've back.
Judge Engelmayer: 5 years is entire off the table. Even 12 years might be unreasonable & here is why. The fraud you pled guilty to cost victims more than $40 billion. Even in SDNY, it's eye popping. There is a 25 year cap, so not life

— Inner City Press (@innercitypress) December 11, 2025

Unlike Ellison, Kwon was a founder, public promoter, and architect of the system at the center of the collapse. The sentencing disparity reflects how courts differentiate between system designers and operators.

Too Lenient Or Legally Consistent?

Ellison’s transition to community confinement is legally routine, but politically charged. To critics, it reinforces perceptions of uneven accountability in crypto scandals. 

To prosecutors, it reflects established sentencing principles: cooperation, reduced authority, and acceptance of responsibility.

For now, Ellison remains under federal supervision. But her exit from prison, even if temporary, has reopened a familiar question — who truly pays the price when crypto empires collapse?

The post FTX Scandal Figure Caroline Ellison Leaves Prison: Was Justice Too Lenient? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

US economic data is flashing early warning signs for risk assets and crypto. The latest labor figures suggest household income growth may weaken heading into 2026.

That trend could reduce retail investment flows, especially into volatile assets like crypto. In the short term, this creates a demand problem rather than a structural crisis.

US Labor Data Signals Slower Disposable Income Growth

The latest Nonfarm Payrolls report showed modest job creation alongside a rising unemployment rate. Wage growth also slowed, pointing to weaker income momentum for households.

Nonfarm payrolls -105k in October … +64k in November pic.twitter.com/tJcn8RSu9m

— Kevin Gordon (@KevRGordon) December 16, 2025

Disposable income matters for crypto adoption. Retail investors typically allocate surplus cash, not leverage, to risk assets.

When wages stagnate and job security weakens, households cut discretionary spending first. Speculative investments often fall into that category.

Retail Investors Are Most Exposed And Altcoins Could Feel It First

Retail participation plays a larger role in altcoin markets than in Bitcoin. Smaller tokens rely heavily on discretionary retail capital chasing higher returns.

Bitcoin, by contrast, attracts institutional flows, ETFs, and long-term holders. That gives it deeper liquidity and stronger downside buffers.

If Americans have less money to invest, altcoins tend to suffer first. Liquidity dries up faster, and price declines can persist longer.

Retail investors may also be forced to exit positions to cover expenses. That selling pressure weighs more heavily on smaller-cap tokens.

Lower Income Does Not Mean Lower Prices, But It Changes The Driver

Asset prices can still rise even when incomes weaken. That typically happens when monetary policy becomes more supportive.

A cooling labor market gives the Federal Reserve room to cut rates. Lower rates can boost asset prices through liquidity rather than household demand.

For crypto, that distinction matters. Rallies driven by liquidity are more fragile and sensitive to macro shocks.

Institutions Face Their Own Headwinds From Japan

Retail weakness is only part of the picture. Institutional investors are also becoming more cautious.

The Bank of Japan’s potential rate hikes threaten global liquidity conditions. They risk unwinding the yen carry trade that has supported risk assets for years.

Bank of Japan is set to hike interest rates by 25bps on December 19

The last 3 times BoJ hiked rates, Bitcoin dumped by over 20%

March 2024 → -27%
July 2024 → -30%
January 2025 → -31%

We already saw a 7% dump last week as investors tried to front-run the dump.

However,… pic.twitter.com/ex77EzHBMh

— Lark Davis (@LarkDavis) December 15, 2025

When borrowing costs rise in Japan, institutions often reduce exposure globally. Crypto, equities, and credit all feel the impact.

The main risk is not collapse, but thin demand. Retail investors may step back due to weaker income growth. Institutions may pause as global liquidity tightens.

Altcoins remain the most vulnerable in this environment. Bitcoin is better positioned to absorb the slowdown.

For now, crypto markets appear to be transitioning. From retail-driven momentum to macro-driven caution.

That shift could define the early months of 2026.

The post Why Americans May Have Less Money For Crypto In 2026 appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Bitcoin traders often focus on the US Federal Reserve. However, the Bank of Japan (BoJ) can be just as important for crypto markets.

That’s because Japan plays a unique role in global liquidity. When that liquidity tightens, Bitcoin often drops hard.

The ‘Cheap Yen’ is Bitcoin’s Hidden Liquidity Engine

For decades, Japan maintained near-zero or negative interest rates. That made the yen one of the cheapest currencies in the world to borrow.

This gave rise to the yen carry trade.

The 🇯🇵 Bank of Japan is about to do a rate hike on Friday the 19th, creating massive fear surrounding the Yen carry trade.

Bitcoin dumped hard the last time they hiked rates:

But why is this exactly? Let’s break it down 👇

What is the Yen Carry Trade?

For decades, the Yen has… pic.twitter.com/YjxzOctjnx

— Mister Crypto (@misterrcrypto) December 14, 2025

Large institutions — including hedge funds, banks, asset managers, and proprietary trading desks — borrow yen through Japanese banks, FX swap markets, and short-term funding channels.

They then convert that yen into dollars or euros. The capital flows into higher-yielding assets.

Those assets include equities, credit, emerging markets, and increasingly, crypto. Bitcoin benefits when this funding stays cheap and abundant.

Bitcoin is especially attractive because it trades 24/7 and offers high volatility. For leveraged funds, it becomes a liquid way to express risk-on positioning.

A BoJ rate hike disrupts that system.

🚨 JAPAN WILL CRASH BITCOIN IN 5 DAYS!!!

People are seriously underestimating what Japan is about to do to Bitcoin.

The Bank of Japan is expected to raise rates again on Dec 19.

That might not sound like a big deal… until you remember one thing:

Japan is the largest holder… pic.twitter.com/0a9Aimfn88

— NoLimit (@NoLimitGains) December 14, 2025

Why a Small BoJ Rate Hike Can Have an Outsized Impact

On paper, the expected BoJ move looks modest.

Markets are pricing a hike of roughly 25 basis points, taking Japan’s policy rate toward 0.75%. That is still far below US or European rates.

But the size of the hike is not the real issue.

Japan spent decades anchored near zero. Even a small increase represents a structural shift in funding conditions.

More importantly, it changes expectations.

If markets believe Japan is entering a multi-step tightening cycle, traders do not wait. They cut exposure early.

That anticipation alone can trigger selling across global risk assets. Bitcoin feels the impact quickly because it trades continuously and reacts faster than stocks or bonds.

How the BoJ Tightening Can Trigger Bitcoin Liquidations

Bitcoin’s sharpest drops rarely come from spot selling alone. They come from leverage.

A hawkish BoJ move can strengthen the yen and lift global yields. That pressures risk assets simultaneously.

Bitcoin then falls through key technical levels. That matters because crypto markets rely heavily on perpetual futures and margin.

As price drops, leveraged long positions hit liquidation thresholds. Exchanges automatically sell collateral to cover losses.

Bank of Japan is set to hike interest rates by 25bps on December 19

The last 3 times BoJ hiked rates, Bitcoin dumped by over 20%

March 2024 → -27%
July 2024 → -30%
January 2025 → -31%

We already saw a 7% dump last week as investors tried to front-run the dump.

However,… pic.twitter.com/ex77EzHBMh

— Lark Davis (@LarkDavis) December 15, 2025

That forced selling pushes Bitcoin lower again. It triggers more liquidations in a cascading loop.

This is why macro events can look like crypto-specific crashes. The initial shock comes from rates and FX.

The second wave comes from crypto’s leverage structure.

What Traders Watch Around BoJ Decisions

BoJ risk builds before the announcement. Traders watch for early warning signs:

• Yen strength, which signals carry trades are unwinding
  
• Rising bond yields, which tighten financial conditions
  
• Falling funding rates or open interest, which show leverage exiting
  
• Key Bitcoin support breaks, which can trigger liquidations
  

The tone of BoJ guidance also matters. A hike with dovish messaging can calm markets.

A hawkish signal can extend selling pressure.

In short, the Bank of Japan matters because it controls a major source of global liquidity. When that liquidity tightens, Bitcoin often pays the price first.

The post Why the Bank of Japan Is So Critical for Bitcoin appeared first on BeInCrypto.

MicroStrategy’s latest Bitcoin buy has quickly come under scrutiny. Just one day after the firm disclosed a major purchase, Bitcoin fell sharply.

On December 14, MicroStrategy announced it had acquired 10,645 BTC for roughly $980.3 million, paying an average price of $92,098 per coin. At the time, Bitcoin was trading near local highs.

A Poorly Timed Buy, At Least in the Short Term

The timing was unfortunate. Only a day after Strategy’s reported purchase, Bitcoin had dropped toward the $85,000 range, briefly trading even lower. At the time of writing BTC remains below $80,000.

Strategy has acquired 10,645 BTC for ~$980.3 million at ~$92,098 per bitcoin and has achieved BTC Yield of 24.9% YTD 2025. As of 12/14/2025, we hodl 671,268 $BTC acquired for ~$50.33 billion at ~$74,972 per bitcoin. $MSTR $STRC $STRK $STRF $STRD $STRE https://t.co/VdAz7pqce1

— Michael Saylor (@saylor) December 15, 2025

Bitcoin’s decline came amid a broader macro-driven sell-off, fueled by Bank of Japan rate-hike fears, leverage liquidations, and market-maker de-risking. MicroStrategy’s purchase landed just ahead of that cascade.

Bitcoin’s Price Drop Was Driven by Liquidations — Not Spot Selling

“In this context, the current move should be viewed less as a collapse in fundamental demand and more as a structural deleveraging event.” – By @xwinfinance pic.twitter.com/i1DSrt2Ttw

— CryptoQuant.com (@cryptoquant_com) December 16, 2025

As Bitcoin slid, MicroStrategy shares fell sharply. Over the past five trading days, the stock dropped more than 25%, significantly underperforming Bitcoin itself.

While shares saw a modest rebound today, they remain far below levels seen before the purchase announcement.

The Numbers Behind the Concern

As of now, MicroStrategy holds 671,268 BTC, acquired for approximately $50.33 billion at an average price of $74,972 per coin.

On a long-term basis, the firm remains deeply in profit.

However, short-term optics matter. With Bitcoin near $85,000, the latest tranche is already underwater on paper.

MicroStrategy’s mNAV currently sits around 1.11, meaning the stock trades only about 11% above the value of its Bitcoin holdings. That premium has compressed rapidly as Bitcoin fell and equity investors reassessed risk.

Why the Market Reacted So Harshly

Investors are not questioning MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin thesis. They are questioning timing and risk management.

The macro risks that triggered Bitcoin’s drop were well telegraphed. Markets had been warning about the Bank of Japan’s potential rate hike and the threat to the yen carry trade for weeks.

Bitcoin has historically sold off aggressively around BOJ tightening cycles. This time was no different.

Critics argue MicroStrategy failed to wait for macro clarity. The firm appeared to buy aggressively near resistance, just as global liquidity conditions tightened.

🚨 JAPAN WILL CRASH BITCOIN IN 5 DAYS!!!

People are seriously underestimating what Japan is about to do to Bitcoin.

The Bank of Japan is expected to raise rates again on Dec 19.

That might not sound like a big deal… until you remember one thing:

Japan is the largest holder… pic.twitter.com/0a9Aimfn88

— NoLimit (@NoLimitGains) December 14, 2025

Was It Actually a Mistake?

That depends on the timeframe.

From a trading perspective, the purchase looks poorly timed. Bitcoin fell immediately, and the stock suffered amplified losses due to leverage, sentiment, and shrinking NAV premium.

From a strategy perspective, MicroStrategy has never aimed to time bottoms. The company continues to frame its purchases around long-term accumulation, not short-term price optimization.

CEO Michael Saylor has repeatedly argued that owning more Bitcoin matters more than entry precision.

The real risk is not the purchase itself. It is what happens next.

If Bitcoin stabilizes and macro pressure eases, MicroStrategy’s latest buy will fade into its long-term cost basis. If Bitcoin drops further, however, the decision will remain a focal point for critics.

MicroStrategy may not have made the worst Bitcoin purchase of 2025. But it may have made the most uncomfortable one.

The post Did MicroStrategy Make Its Worst Bitcoin Purchase of 2025? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has closed its investigation into the Aave Protocol without recommending enforcement action, according to a notice dated December 16.

The decision ends a multi-year probe into one of the largest decentralized finance (DeFi) lending platforms and removes a major regulatory overhang for the sector.

Investigation Closed Without Enforcement

In its notice, the SEC said it had concluded its investigation into the Aave Protocol and does not intend to recommend enforcement action at this time.

However, the agency emphasized that the closure does not constitute an exoneration and does not prevent future action should circumstances change. The notice follows standard SEC practice under Securities Act Release No. 5310.

After four years, we are finally ready to share that the SEC has concluded its investigation into the Aave Protocol.

This process demanded significant effort and resources from our team, and from me personally as the founder, to protect Aave, its ecosystem, and DeFi more… pic.twitter.com/aZeLrZz5ZQ

— Stani.eth (@StaniKulechov) December 16, 2025

The investigation began around 2021–2022, during a period when the SEC intensified scrutiny of crypto lending, staking, and governance tokens.

Aave, a non-custodial DeFi protocol, allows users to lend and borrow digital assets through automated smart contracts. The protocol operates without intermediaries and is governed by holders of the AAVE token.

Aave Revenue and Governance Under the Spotlight

The SEC decision comes as Aave faces separate internal scrutiny over revenue and governance.

Earlier this week, DAO members raised concerns that a front-end infrastructure change may have redirected swap fee revenue away from the Aave DAO treasury. The issue followed a shift from ParaSwap to CoW Swap on Aave’s official interface.

Extremely concerning.

The stealth privatization of approximately 10% of Aave DAO's potential revenue, leveraging brand and IPs paid for by the DAO, represents a clear attack on the best interests of the $AAVE Token holders.

We will prepare an official response with @AaveChan. https://t.co/opoG3I7x7s

— Marc ”七十 Billy” Zeller (@Marczeller) December 12, 2025

Governance delegates said the change could reduce DAO revenue by up to $10 million annually, depending on trading volumes. 

Aave Labs responded that the front-end is a separate product and that prior revenue sharing was voluntary.

For now, Aave emerges from regulatory scrutiny without penalties, which has been a common pattern as the SEC backtracks from crypto enforcement under Paul Atkins.

Still, the protocol faces ongoing questions around governance, decentralization, and value capture as DeFi matures.

The post SEC Drops Long-Running Investigation Into Aave Protocol appeared first on BeInCrypto.

The US Senate has delayed the long-awaited Crypto Market Structure Bill, pushing final consideration into early 2026. Lawmakers ran out of legislative time as internal disputes stalled consensus on key provisions.

The delay prolongs regulatory uncertainty for crypto exchanges, issuers, and institutional investors operating in the US.

Why the Crypto Market Structure Bill Was Delayed

The bill, built on the House-passed Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act, aims to define how digital assets are regulated. It would formally split oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

However, unresolved disagreements over jurisdiction, DeFi oversight, and consumer protections slowed progress.

🚨NEW: In a statement, a Senate Banking Committee spokesperson confirmed my reporting from this AM that @BankingGOP will not hold a market structure markup this year:

“Chairman Scott and the Senate Banking Committee have made strong progress with Democratic counterparts on… pic.twitter.com/op5rIyMn3d

— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) December 15, 2025

Senate negotiators struggled to reconcile differences between the Banking and Agriculture committees. These committees oversee the SEC and CFTC respectively, and both claim authority over crypto spot markets.

As a result, lawmakers could not finalize language that both sides supported before the session ended.

DeFi regulation also emerged as a major sticking point. Some senators pushed for exemptions for decentralized protocols with no controlling intermediary.

Others warned that broad exemptions could weaken enforcement and create regulatory gaps.

Consumer advocacy groups added pressure by opposing parts of the bill. They argue the framework shifts power away from the SEC and risks weakening investor protections after several high-profile crypto failures.

This opposition prompted further revisions and slowed negotiations.

Despite the delay, the bill differs sharply from other crypto legislation already passed. Unlike the GENIUS Act, which focuses narrowly on stablecoins, the market structure bill targets the entire crypto trading ecosystem.

It sets rules for exchanges, brokers, custody providers, and token issuers under a unified federal framework.

The bill also goes further than enforcement-led regulation. It introduces formal asset classification standards and limits reliance on court rulings to define whether tokens are securities or commodities.

Lawmakers say this approach would replace regulatory uncertainty with statutory clarity.

The post US Senate Delays Crypto Market Structure Bill Until 2026 appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Diplomatic efforts to end the Russia–Ukraine war gained visible momentum on Monday, as US, Ukrainian, and European officials outlined the foundations of a possible ceasefire and post-war security framework.

The developments mark one of the most substantive diplomatic advances since the conflict began. The positive signs are already prompting investors to reassess geopolitical risk across global markets, including cryptocurrencies.

For crypto, which has recently suffered sharp declines tied to global risk-off dynamics, a ceasefire could alter sentiment, but not without important caveats.

Diplomatic Momentum Builds For Russian-Ukraine Ceasefire

Negotiators from Ukraine, the US, and key European allies met in Berlin this week for an intensive round of talks focused on ending hostilities and preventing renewed conflict. 

Officials involved in the discussions described progress as significant, with alignment reached on most elements of a proposed framework.

US officials confirmed that Washington has agreed to support meaningful security guarantees for Ukraine as part of a peace arrangement, addressing Kyiv’s long-standing demand for protection against future aggression. 

Flood of positive-sounding headlines as US official briefs media on Ukraine talks, says 90% of issues solved, Polymarket pricing just 3% odds of ceasefire this year pic.twitter.com/IMVlegXJGW

— db (@tier10k) December 15, 2025

According to officials familiar with the talks, negotiators are now aligned on roughly 90% of the framework. 

However, remaining disagreements centered on territorial questions in eastern Ukraine, particularly in the Donetsk region.

European leaders reinforced the diplomatic push by endorsing plans for a European-led multinational force that would assist in stabilizing Ukraine if a ceasefire holds. The proposal also includes a US-backed monitoring and verification mechanism designed to oversee ceasefire compliance and respond to violations.

Most recent polls suggest that only 38% of Ukraine's population are in favor of giving up any territory, even if it means the war must drag on. pic.twitter.com/kSsAPc6ZsS

— SPRAVDI — Stratcom Centre (@StratcomCentre) December 11, 2025

Public opinion inside Ukraine continues to act as a constraint on negotiations. Polling cited by Reuters shows that most Ukrainians oppose major territorial concessions or limits on the country’s military capabilities unless backed by firm and enforceable security commitments.

Fighting Continues Despite Negotiations

Even as diplomacy advances, military operations have not paused. On Monday, Ukrainian forces carried out additional long-range drone strikes against Russian oil infrastructure in the Caspian Sea, disrupting production at key platforms for the third time in recent days. 

The attacks highlight Kyiv’s strategy of applying economic pressure on Russia’s energy revenues while negotiations remain unresolved.

Ukraine has opened another front against Russia. Ukraine has begun striking Russian oil platforms and ships in the Caspian Sea. Russia is helpless to stop these Ukrainian drone and missile attacks. pic.twitter.com/bD3YW5Yg4P

— Jake Broe (@RealJakeBroe) December 14, 2025

Ukraine also claimed it struck a Russian Kilo-class submarine in the port of Novorossiysk using underwater drones. 

If confirmed, would underscore the growing sophistication of Ukraine’s asymmetric naval capabilities. Independent verification of the claim remains limited, and Russian officials have denied damage.

What a Ceasefire Could Mean for Crypto Markets

1. Reduced Safe-Haven Demand, Improved Risk Appetite

A credible ceasefire would remove one of the largest sources of global tail risk. In markets where risk sentiment is a major driver, such a de-escalation can:

• Boost risk assets broadly, reducing demand for traditional safe havens like the US Treasuries and the US dollar.
  
• Support assets like Bitcoin and major altcoins as investors rotate back toward higher-beta investments.
  
• Lower implied volatility across equity and digital asset markets.

The mechanics are straightforward: with reduced geopolitical risk, funds that fled to safety may redeploy into risk assets, potentially lifting Bitcoin and Ethereum prices. A stronger risk appetite could also benefit altcoins, which tend to outperform in relief rallies.

2. Energy and Inflation Narrative

A sustained ceasefire could also affect commodity markets, especially if it lessens pressure on energy prices. Lower or stabilized global energy prices could:

• Dampen inflation expectations in Europe and elsewhere.
  
• Reduce pressure on central banks to maintain restrictive policy settings.
  
• Allow liquidity conditions to ease further, which historically has supported higher valuations in risk assets such as cryptocurrencies.

However, this transmission is neither direct nor immediate. It depends on how quickly markets perceive structural changes in energy markets and central bank policy trajectories.

What Might Limit the Crypto Recovery

While a ceasefire can reduce geopolitical risk, it cannot fully offset macro headwinds that influenced crypto markets over the past months:

• Persisting central bank uncertainty: If the Bank of Japan proceeds with tightening and the US data continues to suggest sticky inflation, liquidity could remain constrained, muting upside in risk assets.
  
• Derivative market positioning: Leverage has been a significant catalyst of past crypto declines. Relief rallies can trigger fresh positioning and high funding rates, only to be reversed if macro forces reassert.
  
• Liquidity conditions: A ceasefire is good news, but sustained asset price rallies require ample liquidity. Without clearer signals of easing financial conditions, crypto assets may see only transient relief moves.
  

A Ceasefire Would Be Positive, But Not Sufficient

An agreed ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine would mark a monumental shift in geopolitics and initially bolster risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. 

However, the broader impact on crypto markets will depend heavily on how the ceasefire intersects with liquidity conditions, central bank policy expectations, and global risk appetite.

In the short term, crypto could see a meaningful relief rally, driven by sentiment and risk reallocation. 

Over the medium term, the trend will likely hinge on whether ceasefire outcomes tangibly ease inflation and liquidity pressures — the primary macro drivers that have influenced digital assets in recent months.

The post How a Potential Russia–Ukraine Ceasefire Could Impact Crypto Markets appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Bitcoin slid to the $85,000 level on December 15, extending its recent decline as global macro risks, leverage unwinding, and thin liquidity collided. The drop erased more than $100 billion from the total crypto market cap in just days, raising questions about whether the sell-off has finished.

While no single catalyst caused the move, five overlapping forces pushed Bitcoin lower and could keep pressure on prices in the near term.

Bank of Japan Rate Hike Fears Triggered Global De-Risking

The biggest macro driver came from Japan. Markets moved ahead of a widely expected Bank of Japan rate hike later this week, which would take Japanese policy rates to levels unseen in decades. 

Even a modest hike matters because Japan has long fueled global risk markets through the yen carry trade.

🚨 JAPAN WILL CRASH BITCOIN IN 5 DAYS!!!

People are seriously underestimating what Japan is about to do to Bitcoin.

The Bank of Japan is expected to raise rates again on Dec 19.

That might not sound like a big deal… until you remember one thing:

Japan is the largest holder… pic.twitter.com/0a9Aimfn88

— NoLimit (@NoLimitGains) December 14, 2025

For years, investors borrowed cheap yen to buy higher-risk assets such as equities and crypto. As Japanese rates rise, that trade unwinds. Investors sell risk assets to repay yen liabilities.

Bitcoin has reacted sharply to previous BOJ hikes. In the last three instances, BTC fell between 20% and 30% in the weeks that followed. Traders began pricing in that historical pattern before the decision, pushing Bitcoin lower in advance.

Bank of Japan is about to hike rates with 0.25% on December 19

Bitcoin dumped the last 3 times the BoJ hiked interest rates:

March 2024 → -27%
July 2024 → -30%
January 2025 → -30% pic.twitter.com/GNjHyUIV3d

— Quinten | 048.eth (@QuintenFrancois) December 15, 2025

US Economic Data Reintroduces Policy Uncertainty

At the same time, traders pulled back risk ahead of a dense slate of US macro data, including inflation and labor market figures.

The Federal Reserve recently cut rates, but officials signaled caution about the pace of future easing. That uncertainty matters for Bitcoin, which has increasingly traded as a liquidity-sensitive macro asset rather than a standalone hedge.

With inflation still above target and jobs data expected to weaken, markets struggled to price the Fed’s next move. That hesitation reduced speculative demand and encouraged short-term traders to step aside.

As a result, Bitcoin lost momentum just as it approached key technical levels.

MACRO DATA TOMORROW 👇

– 🇪🇺 GDP (Q2)
– 🇺🇸 Nonfarm Payrolls (Aug)
– 🇺🇸 Unemployment Rate (Aug)

MORE VOLATILITY INCOMING! pic.twitter.com/eiVJI7Bmxx

— Mister Crypto (@misterrcrypto) September 4, 2025

Heavy Leverage Liquidations Accelerated the Decline

Once Bitcoin broke below $90,000, forced selling took over.

More than $200 million in leveraged long positions were liquidated within hours, according to derivatives data. Long traders had crowded into bullish bets after the Fed’s rate cut earlier this month.

When prices slipped, liquidation engines sold Bitcoin automatically to cover losses. That selling pushed prices lower, triggering further liquidations in a feedback loop.

This mechanical effect explains why the move was fast and sharp rather than gradual.

Thin Weekend Liquidity Magnified Price Swings

The timing of the sell-off made it worse.

Bitcoin broke down during thin weekend trading, when liquidity is typically lower and order books are shallow. In those conditions, relatively small sell orders can move prices aggressively.

Large holders and derivatives desks reduced exposure into low liquidity, amplifying volatility. That dynamic helped pull Bitcoin from the low-$90,000 range toward $85,000 in a short window.

Weekend breakdowns often look dramatic even when broader fundamentals remain unchanged.

Wintermute’s Bitcoin Sales Added Spot-Market Pressure

Market structure stress was compounded by significant selling from Wintermute, one of the crypto industry’s largest market makers.

During the sell-off, on-chain and market data showed Wintermute offloading a large amount of Bitcoin — estimated at over $1.5 billion worth — across centralized exchanges. The firm reportedly sold BTC to rebalance risk and cover exposure following recent volatility and losses in derivatives markets.

Because Wintermute provides liquidity across both spot and derivatives venues, its selling carried outsized impact. 

The timing of the sales also mattered. Wintermute’s activity occurred during low-liquidity conditions, amplifying downside moves and accelerating Bitcoin’s slide toward $85,000.

What Happens Next?

Whether Bitcoin drops further now depends on macro follow-through, not crypto-specific news.

If the Bank of Japan confirms a rate hike and global yields rise, Bitcoin could remain under pressure as carry trades unwind further. A strong yen would add to that stress.

However, if markets fully price in the move and US data softens enough to revive rate-cut expectations, Bitcoin could stabilize after the liquidation phase ends.

For now, the December 15 sell-off reflects a macro-driven reset, not a structural failure of the crypto market — but volatility is unlikely to fade quickly.

The post 5 Reasons Bitcoin Fell to $85,000 and Why More Downside Is Possible appeared first on BeInCrypto.

The Russia-Ukraine war has waged on for nearly 4 years now. Western sanctions were meant to isolate Russia financially. Instead, they forced adaptation.

In 2025, BeInCrypto began documenting how Russia and Russia-linked actors rebuilt payment routes using crypto. What emerged was not a single exchange or token, but a resilient system designed to survive freezes, seizures, and enforcement delays.

This investigation reconstructs that system in chronological order, based on on-chain forensic analysis and interviews with investigators tracking the flows.

The First Warning Signs Were not Criminal

Early signals did not point to ransomware or darknet markets. They pointed to trade.

Authorities began asking new questions on how money crossed borders for imports, how dual-use goods were paid for, and how settlements occurred without banks. 

At the same time, on-chain data showed Russian OTC desks surging in activity. Exchanges hosting Russian OTC liquidity also saw volumes spike, especially in Asia.

Meanwhile, Telegram groups and darknet forums discussed sanctions evasion openly. These were not hidden conversations. They described practical methods for moving value across borders without banks.

The method was simple. OTC desks accepted rubles domestically, sometimes as cash. They issued stablecoins or crypto. That crypto then settled abroad, where it could be converted into local currency.

Garantex Operated Russia’s Crypto Laundering Hub

Garantex played a critical role in this ecosystem. It functioned as a liquidity hub for OTC desks, migrants, and trade-linked payments.

Even after early sanctions, it continued interacting with regulated exchanges abroad. That activity persisted for months.

When enforcement finally escalated, the expectation was disruption. What followed instead was preparation.

“Even people who were leaving Russia were still using Garantex to move their money out. If you were trying to relocate to places like Dubai, this became one of the main ways to transfer funds once traditional banking routes were cut off. For many Russians trying to leave the country, Garantex became a practical exit route. It was one of the few ways to move money abroad after banks and SWIFT were no longer an option,” said Lex Fisun, CEO of Global Ledger

The Seizure Triggered a Reserve Scramble

On the day Garantex’s infrastructure was seized in March 2025, a linked Ethereum wallet rapidly consolidated more than 3,200 ETH. Within hours, nearly the entire balance moved into Tornado Cash.

That move mattered. Tornado Cash does not facilitate payouts. It breaks transaction history.

Days later, dormant Bitcoin reserves began moving. Wallets untouched since 2022 consolidated BTC. This was not panic selling. It was treasury management under pressure.

So, it was clear that assets outside stablecoin control remained accessible.

A Successor Appeared Almost Immediately

As access to Garantex faded, a new service emerged.

Grinex launched quietly and began supporting USDT. Traced flows passed through TRON and connected to Grinex-linked infrastructure. Users reported balances reappearing under the new name.

“It was probably the most obvious rebrand we’ve seen. The name was nearly the same, the website was nearly the same, and users who lost access to Garantex saw their balances reappear on Grinex,” Fisun told BeInCrypto. 

In late July 2025, Garantex publicly announced payouts to former users in Bitcoin and Ethereum. On-chain data confirmed the system was already live.

At least $25 million in crypto had been distributed. Much more remained untouched.

The payout structure followed a clear pattern where reserves were layered through mixers, aggregation wallets, and cross-chain bridges before reaching users.

Ethereum Payouts Relied on Complexity

Ethereum payouts used deliberate obfuscation. Funds moved through Tornado Cash, then into a DeFi protocol, then across multiple chains. Transfers bounced between Ethereum, Optimism, and Arbitrum before landing in payout wallets.

Despite the complexity, only a fraction of the ETH reserves reached users. More than 88% remained untouched, indicating payouts were still in early stages.

Bitcoin Payouts Exposed a Different Weakness

Bitcoin payouts were simpler and more centralized.

Investigators identified multiple payout wallets linked to a single aggregation hub that received nearly 200 BTC. That hub remained active months after the seizure.

More revealing was where the funds touched next.

Source wallets repeatedly interacted with deposit addresses tied to one of the world’s largest centralized exchanges. The transaction “change” consistently routed back there.

Why Western Sanctions Struggled to Keep Up

Western sanctions were not absent. They were late, uneven, and slow to execute.

By the time Garantex was fully disrupted, investigators had already documented billions of dollars moving through its wallets. 

Even after sanctions were applied, the exchange continued interacting with regulated platforms abroad, exploiting delays between designation, enforcement, and compliance updates.

The core problem was not a lack of legal authority. It was the speed mismatch between sanctions enforcement and crypto infrastructure. While regulators operate on weeks or months, crypto systems reroute liquidity in hours.

“Sanctions work on paper. The problem is execution. Billions can still move because enforcement is slow, fragmented, and often lags behind how fast crypto systems adapt. The issue isn’t that sanctions don’t exist. It’s that they’re enforced too slowly for a system that moves at crypto speed,” said the Global Ledger CEO. 

That gap allowed Garantex to adapt. Wallets rotated frequently. Hot wallets changed unpredictably. Remaining balances were moved in ways that mimicked normal exchange activity, making automated compliance systems less effective.

The private sector struggled to keep up. Banks and exchanges balance compliance obligations against transaction speed, customer friction, and operational cost. 

In that environment, sanctioned exposure can slip through when activity does not trigger obvious red flags.

By October 2025, the payout infrastructure was still active. Reserves remained. Routes stayed open.

This was not the collapse of an exchange, rather he evolution of a system.

Russia’s crypto strategy in 2025 showed how a sanctioned economy adapts by building parallel rails, preserving liquidity, and rerouting when blocked.

The post Inside Putin’s Crypto Cold War: How Russia Evaded Western Sanctions In 2025 appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Tether has submitted a binding all-cash proposal to acquire Exor’s entire 65.4% stake in Juventus Football Club, the most successful club in Italian football history and a 36-time Serie A champion.

If approved by regulators and accepted by Exor, Tether said it would launch a public tender offer for the remaining shares at the same price, fully funded with its own capital. The company also committed to invest up to €1 billion to support and develop the club following completion.

What the Juventus Deal Means for Tether

The proposal, announced on December 12, marks one of the most ambitious moves yet by a crypto company into elite global sport. It signals a strategic shift for Tether from a pure stablecoin issuer to a long-term capital allocator in traditional institutions.

In the announcement, Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino described Juventus as a symbol of discipline, resilience, and continuity—values he said mirror how Tether has been built.

JUST IN: Tether wants to acquire Italian football club Juventus.

Juventus is a 36-time domestic league champion, making it the most successful club in Italian football history. pic.twitter.com/l1yncxgW9L

— BeInCrypto (@beincrypto) December 12, 2025

From a business perspective, the acquisition would give Tether control of a globally recognised sports brand, expanding its footprint beyond financial infrastructure into media, entertainment, and global fan economies. 

Unlike short-term sponsorships or fan token partnerships, ownership places Tether at the centre of governance and long-term strategy.

The move also reinforces Tether’s claim that it is operating from a position of strong balance-sheet health, able to deploy billions in capital without external financing.

Part of a Broader Expansion Strategy

The Juventus proposal follows a series of high-profile moves by Tether and USDT in recent weeks.

Tether recently secured regulatory recognition for USDT as an Accepted Fiat-Referenced Token in Abu Dhabi’s ADGM, expanding regulated use of the stablecoin across multiple blockchains.

At the same time, the company has explored tokenising its own equity, signalling openness to new corporate structures built on blockchain rails.

Beyond finance, Tether has also pushed into AI, robotics, and privacy-focused consumer technology, backing robotics firms and launching privacy-centric health and AI products.

Together, these developments point to a strategy of diversifying well beyond stablecoin issuance while

Juventus and Crypto: Not a First Connection

Juventus is no stranger to crypto involvement.

The club previously launched the $JUV fan token on the Chiliz and Socios platform, allowing fans to participate in polls and engagement initiatives. Juventus has also partnered with crypto companies as sponsors, including exchange-led branding deals in recent seasons.

However, Tether’s proposal goes far beyond past crypto partnerships. If completed, it would represent full operational control by a digital asset firm—an unprecedented step for a club of Juventus’ stature.

The transaction remains subject to Exor’s acceptance, definitive legal agreements, and regulatory approvals. If those conditions are met, Tether plans to proceed with a public tender offer for remaining shares.

The post Tether Moves to Buy Juventus in Landmark Crypto Sports Deal appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Claims that Wall Street trading firm Jane Street triggers a daily 10 a.m. Bitcoin “dump” resurfaced on December 12, after BTC saw a sharp intraday drop. 

Social media speculation once again pointed to institutional traders and ETF market makers. A closer look at the data, however, tells a more nuanced story.

What is the “Jane Street 10 a.m.” Narrative?

The theory suggests Bitcoin often sells off around 9:30–10:00 a.m. ET, when US equity markets open. Jane Street is frequently named because it is a major market maker and an authorized participant for US spot Bitcoin ETFs.

The allegation claims these firms push prices lower to trigger liquidations, then buy back cheaper. However, no regulator, exchange, or data source has ever confirmed such coordinated activity.

BREAKING: The 10am manipulation is back.

Bitcoin dropped $2,000 in 35 minutes and wiped out $40 billion from its market cap.

$132 million worth of longs have been liquidated in the past 60 minutes.

This is getting ridiculous. https://t.co/0DRTFfL08r pic.twitter.com/RByT4CWF65

— Bull Theory (@BullTheoryio) December 12, 2025

Bitcoin Futures Data Doesn’t Show Aggressive Dumping

Bitcoin traded sideways today through the US market open, holding a tight range near $92,000–$93,000. There was no sudden or abnormal sell-off exactly at 10:00 a.m. ET.

The sharp drop came later in the session, closer to mid-day US hours. BTC briefly fell below $90,000 before stabilizing, suggesting delayed pressure rather than an open-driven move.

Bitcoin futures open interest across major exchanges remained broadly stable. Total open interest was nearly flat on the day, indicating no large buildup of new short positions.

On CME, the most relevant venue for institutional trading, open interest declined modestly. That pattern typically reflects risk reduction or hedging, not aggressive directional selling.

If a major proprietary firm were driving a coordinated dump, a sharp spike or collapse in open interest would normally appear. It did not.

Liquidations Explain the Move

Liquidation data provides a clearer explanation. Over the past 24 hours, total crypto liquidations exceeded $430 million, with long positions accounting for the majority.

Bitcoin alone saw more than $68 million in liquidations, while Ethereum liquidations were even higher. This indicates a leverage flush across the market, not a Bitcoin-specific event.

When prices slip below key levels, forced liquidations can accelerate declines. This often creates sharp drops without requiring a single dominant seller.

Most notably, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $77 million outflow on December 11, after two days of steady inflow. Today’s brief price shock was largely reflected in this move. 

No Single Venue Led the Sell-Off

The move was distributed across exchanges, including Binance, CME, OKX, and Bybit. There was no evidence of selling pressure concentrated on one venue or one instrument.

That matters because coordinated manipulation typically leaves a footprint. This event showed broad, cross-market participation consistent with automated risk unwinds.

Why the Jane Street Narrative Keeps Returning

Bitcoin volatility often clusters around US market hours due to ETF trading, macro data releases, and institutional portfolio adjustments. These structural factors can make price moves appear patterned.

Jane Street Bots already entered Polymarket xD

While most traders chase narratives, one Polymarket account turned 15-minute crypto prediction windows into a mechanical profit engine.

Trader didn't build a sophisticated arbitrage bot.

He found something simpler, momentum lag on… pic.twitter.com/KHUJog4u6C

— gemchanger (@gemchange_ltd) December 12, 2025

Jane Street’s visibility in ETF market making makes it an easy target for speculation. But market making involves hedging and inventory management, not directional price attacks.

Today’s move fits a familiar pattern in crypto markets. Leverage builds, price slips, liquidations cascade, and narratives follow.

The post Did Jane Street Cause Another 10 a.m. Bitcoin Dump Today? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Bitcoin approaches Christmas 2025 in a fragile but interesting position. Price trades around the $93,000 area after weeks of pressure. Four key charts show a market late in its correction, yet still lacking a clear bullish trigger.

The data highlights three big forces at work. Recent buyers sit in heavy losses, while new whales are capitulating. Macro conditions still drive price, even as spot buying strength quietly returns.

Short-Term Bitcoin Holders are in Deep Pain

The first chart tracks short-term holder (STH) realized profit and loss. This group includes coins bought in recent months. Their “realized price” is the average cost basis for these coins. 

Earlier in 2025, STHs sat on strong gains. Their average position was 15–20% in profit as Bitcoin pushed higher. That phase encouraged profit-taking and added sell pressure near the highs.

Today, the picture has flipped. Bitcoin trades below the STH realized price, and the cohort shows about -10% losses. The histogram on the chart is red, marking one of the deepest loss regimes of 2025.

This has two consequences.

Near term, these underwater holders can sell into every bounce. Many simply want out at break-even, which caps rallies toward their entry zone.

However, deep and persistent loss pockets usually appear later in corrections. They signal that weak hands already took heavy damage.

At some point, the selling power of this group runs low.

75% of Short-Term Holder's coins are sitting in loss (over 4.36 million BTC).

Interestingly enough, this is a comparable trend to the prior two local bottoms of this Bitcoin cycle. pic.twitter.com/2w1J4rXzi9

— On-Chain College (@OnChainCollege) December 8, 2025

Historically, the key turning signal comes when price reclaims the STH realized price from below. That move tells you forced selling is mostly done and new demand absorbs supply.

Until that happens, the chart still argues for caution and range trading around current levels.

New Bitcoin Whales Just Surrendered

The second chart shows realized profit and loss by whale cohorts. It splits flows between “new whales” and “old whales”. New whales are large holders that accumulated recently.

Yesterday, new whales realized $386 million in losses in one day. Their bar on the chart is a large negative spike. Several other big negative bars cluster around recent lows.

Old whales tell a different story. Their realized losses and profits are smaller and more balanced. They are not exiting at the same pace as the newcomers.

This pattern is typical at late stages of a correction. New whales often buy late, sometimes with leverage or strong narrative bias. When price moves against them, they are first to capitulate.

That capitulation has a structural benefit. Coins move from weak large hands to stronger hands or smaller buyers. Future sell-side overhang from this group decreases after such events.

Short term, these flushes can still drag price lower. Yet medium term, they improve the quality of Bitcoin’s holder base.

The market becomes more resilient once panicked large sellers finish exiting.

Real Interest Rates Still Steer Bitcoin

The third chart overlays Bitcoin with two-year US real yields, inverted. Real yields measure interest rates after inflation. The series moves almost tick-for-tick with BTC across 2025.

When real yields fall, the inverted line rises. Bitcoin tends to rise alongside it as liquidity improves. Lower real yields make risk assets more appealing relative to safe bonds.

Since late summer, real yields have moved higher again. The inverted line trended lower, and Bitcoin followed it down. This shows macro conditions still dominate the larger trend.

Federal Reserve rate cuts alone may not fix this. What matters is how markets expect real borrowing costs to evolve. If inflation expectations fall faster than nominal rates, real yields can even rise.

For Bitcoin, a durable new bull leg likely needs easier real conditions. Until bond markets price that shift, BTC rallies face a macro headwind.

What is driving the drawdown in Bitcoin?

When you stop listening to Bitcoin pundits and start listening to what Bitcoin is saying about itself, then you will see the real truth

I am going to lay out the 3 major things you need to watch for Bitcoin right now 🧵 pic.twitter.com/FC60PPt2gG

— Capital Flows (@Globalflows) December 11, 2025

Spot Taker Buyers are Stepping Back In

The fourth chart tracks 90-day Spot Taker CVD across major exchanges. CVD measures the net volume of market orders that cross the spread.

It shows whether aggressive buyers or sellers dominate.

For weeks during the drawdown, the regime was Taker Sell Dominant. Red bars filled the chart as sellers hit bids across spot markets. This aligned with the grinding drift lower in price.

Now the signal has flipped. The metric just turned Taker Buy Dominant, with green bars returning. Aggressive buyers now outnumber aggressive sellers on spot venues.

Taker Buy momentum is back 🔄

Bitcoin's 90-day Spot Taker CVD just flipped to **Taker Buy Dominant** — marking a shift in market behavior after weeks of sell-side pressure.

Buy-side aggression is returning across major spot exchanges. pic.twitter.com/w5uaGcGHPi

— Maartunn (@JA_Maartun) December 11, 2025

This is an early but important change. Trend reversals often start with microstructure shifts like this.
First buyers step in, then price stabilizes, then larger flows follow.

One day of data is never enough. However, a sustained green regime would confirm that real demand is back. It would show spot markets absorbing supply from STHs and capitulating whales.

What It All Means For Bitcoin Price Heading Into Christmas

Taken together, the four charts show a late-stage correction, not a fresh bull market.

Short-term holders and new whales carry heavy losses and still sell into strength. Macro real yields keep a lid on risk appetite at the index level.

At the same time, some building blocks for a recovery are visible. Capitulation by new whales cleans up the holder base.

Spot taker buyers are returning, which reduces downside velocity.

Heading into Christmas 2025, Bitcoin looks range-bound with a bearish tilt, hovering around $90,000.

Downside spikes into the mid or high-$80,000s remain possible if real yields stay high. A clear bullish shift likely needs three signals together:

First, price must reclaim the short-term holders’ realized price and hold above it. Second, two-year real yields should roll lower, easing financial conditions.

Third, Taker Buy dominance should persist, confirming strong spot demand.

Until that alignment appears, traders face a choppy market shaped by macro data and trapped holders. Long-term investors may see this as a planning zone rather than a time for aggressive bets.

The post 4 Charts Explain Bitcoin’s Price Condition Heading into Christmas 2025 appeared first on BeInCrypto.