Normal view

DAT Firms Sell Crypto to Save Their Stocks: Is This Sustainable?

21 November 2025 at 09:17

FG Nexus sold $32.7 million in Ethereum to fund share buybacks after its stock fell 94% in four months, highlighting the deepening net asset value (NAV) crisis among digital asset treasury companies.

The sale follows ETHZilla’s $40 million ETH offload in October, underlining mounting pressures throughout a sector managing over $42.7 billion in cryptocurrency assets. This wave of forced selling underscores vulnerabilities in the corporate crypto treasury model, as companies wrestle with stocks trading below the value of their underlying asset holdings.

Treasury Companies Resort to Asset Sales Amid Stock Collapse

FG Nexus disclosed selling 10,922 ETH in October to support a $200 million share buyback. The company began repurchasing shares after its stock fell steeply below NAV, a measure of per-share underlying crypto value. FG Nexus retained 40,005 ETH and $37 million in cash, with total debt rising to $11.9 million, as of Wednesday.

The firm bought back 3.4 million shares at about $3.45 each, representing 8% of its outstanding shares. Management stressed that shares were purchased at a discount to NAV, which reached $3.94 per share by mid-November. This strategy, however, required roughly $10 million in debt and a liquidation of 21% of ETH reserves compared to September levels.

FG Nexus Sold $32.7M in $ETH: Treasury Companies Are Starting to Sell

🔹 FG Nexus sold $32.7M in ETH (10922 ETH)
🔹 Now holds around 40,005 ETH
🔹 Other DAT companies are also reducing their ETH positions
🔹 $FGNX Stock down -94% in 4 months

Their stock is also down 94% in the… pic.twitter.com/A0hXYQaKk3

— Crypto Patel (@CryptoPatel) November 20, 2025

FG Nexus is one of several digital asset treasury companies pursuing crypto sales. ETHZilla announced an approximate $40 million ETH sale to facilitate stock repurchases in late October. The company bought 600,000 shares for nearly $12 million since October 24, seeking relief from a persistent 30% discount to NAV.

When a DAT company’s shares trade at a discount to the value of its crypto holdings (mNAV below 1.0), shareholders push management to realize that hidden value. The most effective way to do this is through a stock buyback, but securing the funds necessary to repurchase shares requires cash. If the company lacks sufficient cash reserves, it must sell some of its crypto assets to finance the buyback.

The mNAV of Metaplanet, a DAT company that accumulates Bitcoin, dropped to 0.99 before recovering to 1.03. Its shares have lost 70% since their June highs, signaling sector-wide stress. The use of perpetual preferred equity, which blends fixed dividends with crypto exposure, further complicates capital structures already under pressure from current market conditions.

Leveraged Structures Amplify Market Pressure

DAT companies deployed $42.7 billion in crypto during 2025, with $22.6 billion accumulated in Q3 alone. This expansion accelerated as Bitcoin rallied above $126,000 in October, fueling positive feedback loops and rising valuations. However, subsequent reversals exposed weaknesses in capital structures built on leverage and capital market access.

Treasury companies account for only 0.83% of total crypto market capitalization. Their concentration of holdings, however, amplifies their impact during downturns. Leverage via convertible notes, PIPE deals, and perpetual preferred equity increases selling pressure when prices fall or NAV discounts widen.

Market liquidity deteriorated sharply as asset prices dropped. Bitcoin’s order book depth at the 1% band fell from $20 million to $14 million—a 33% decrease that heightens price sensitivity to any selling. Analysts estimate forced treasury company sales could reach $4 billion to $6 billion if 10% to 15% of positions are liquidated, potentially surpassing November’s $2.33 billion in ETF outflows.

Systemic Risks Mount as Buying Halts

Corporate crypto buying has stalled due to waning confidence and reduced capital deployment. Companies that once offered steady demand are now selling, reversing earlier positive cycles. MicroStrategy’s stock fell 60% amid Bitcoin volatility, showing the risk of correlation between crypto prices and equity values even for companies with solid balance sheets.

Smaller treasury firms are under increased stress, especially those holding less liquid assets. Several firms exposed to Solana experienced 40% NAV drawdowns as concentrated bets deepened losses. Limited diversification and thin trading volumes in alternative cryptocurrencies add to broader sector vulnerabilities.

Oof. BitMine is down $3.7 BILLION on its massive $ETH bet.

That's the risk of being a Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) company!

Question: Will we see more firms try this, or is this a flashing red warning for corporate crypto treasuries? $ETH ETFs are looming… pic.twitter.com/emOvzQQQTD

— DrBullZeus (@DrBullZeus) November 20, 2025

Retail investors also contributed to selling by exiting positions in advance, reducing market demand as institutional holders began liquidating. In November, $4 billion in ETF outflows and reduced market-maker activity intensified volatility. These conditions resemble leverage-fueled market crashes seen in other asset classes, such as the 2008 mortgage REIT crisis.

This growing crisis challenges the resilience of the digital asset treasury model in prolonged downturns. Rigorous risk management and regulatory oversight could be necessary to prevent self-reinforcing selloffs from destabilizing the broader market. In the weeks ahead, these companies’ ability to maintain their crypto holdings without further forced liquidation will determine whether the sector survives intact or undergoes fundamental restructuring.

The post DAT Firms Sell Crypto to Save Their Stocks: Is This Sustainable? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Why Does Asia Keep Buying Bitcoin While Americans Are Selling?

21 November 2025 at 08:19

Bitcoin’s recent price decline has revealed a sharp split in trading, with US sessions driving sell-offs while Asian traders steadily buy the dip. Data shows American sessions have become the weakest period for Bitcoin prices.

This divergence highlights contrasting risk appetites and sparks debate about whether Bitcoin is experiencing a healthy correction or facing deeper structural issues.

US Trading Drives Bitcoin Sell-Offs, Asia Absorbs Supply

This week’s price activity reflects a clear trend: US trading hours show persistent losses, with European sessions experiencing smaller declines. In contrast, Asian-Pacific markets remain comparatively stable and often support price recoveries. Data snapshots underline the US trading window’s central role in recent market drops.

BTC cumulative return by session chart
Bitcoin cumulative returns by trading session show US weakness. Source: CryptoRover

An X user commented, “Every single America session consists of relentless selling for hours. Then the Asians wake up and buy it all back until the Americans wake up. Like literal clockwork”. This interplay has become a regular feature of current trading dynamics.

The split may stem from differing risk sentiment across regions. US selling is likely due to caution over macroeconomic signals, policy changes, or liquidity. By contrast, many Asian traders view dips as buying opportunities, either because of confidence in Bitcoin’s outlook or because of varied investment approaches.

Liquidity and market depth factor in, too. US trading brings high volume, so broad selling can strongly affect global price moves. When American traders favor selling, global prices drop until Asian buyers step in and restore balance.

The Coinbase Premium Index, which reflects US institutional sentiment, has remained in negative territory for almost the entire month of November. Source: Coinglass

It’s also notable that retail investors are generally bearish, while whales are bullish and US institutions are bearish. The Coinbase Premium Index, which reflects US institutional sentiment, has remained in negative territory for almost the entire month of November.

Institutional Players Alter Traditional Bitcoin Cycles

On-chain analyst Ki Young Ju offers a detailed view of today’s market landscape. He notes that Bitcoin’s bull cycle technically ended earlier in 2024 after reaching $100,000. Traditional cycle theory would suggest prices drop toward $56,000 to set a new cycle low.

If you are not trading futures and only holding Bitcoin spot, this looks like a reasonable long-term accumulation zone.

To be fair, from an on-chain cycle perspective, the bull cycle technically ended earlier this year when Bitcoin touched around $100K.

In classic cycle…

— Ki Young Ju (@ki_young_ju) November 20, 2025

Such institutional absorption creates a virtual price floor, since major holders with steady conviction are unlikely to sell during downturns. Traditional models assumed most participants might capitulate in a bear phase, but strategic corporate treasuries challenge that assumption.

Yet, some warn that concentration creates fresh risks. If institutions face financial stress or change strategies, any large sale could disrupt the market. So far, however, they remain committed to holding and accumulating Bitcoin.

Experts See Healthy Correction in Ongoing Bull Market

Chris Kuiper, vice president of research at Fidelity Digital Assets, sees the recent correction in a positive light. He describes the drawdown as a standard adjustment in a larger bull market, not a sign that the cycle is over.

Kuiper’s analysis uses on-chain signals, such as the MVRV ratio for short-term holders. These stats indicate that the current price tests recent buyers’ conviction, echoing prior corrections that preceded further rallies. It shows that those who bought recently face unrealized losses before the market resets and trends higher.

Bitcoin short-term holder MVRV chart
Short-term holder MVRV ratio suggests a typical bull market correction. Source: Glassnode via Chris Kuiper

Lack of negative headline events supports his interpretation. No significant regulatory action, exchange failures, or macro shocks have triggered the pullback. Instead, profit-taking and leverage liquidations after Bitcoin’s rally toward $100,000 appear to be the main causes.

Is this a local bottom for #bitcoin and other digital assets?

I as well as anyone never knows for sure, but one chart I do like to use to help gauge the probabilities is the short-term holder MVRV chart along with their cost basis (first chart).

Note that if this indeed is a… pic.twitter.com/B66onRgEgl

— Chris Kuiper, CFA (@ChrisJKuiper) November 19, 2025

Traders now weigh two scenarios. The split between optimistic Asian buyers and cautious US sellers could be resolved if American sentiment improves or persists if global market structures shift further. Broader macro trends—such as government liquidity measures and regulatory changes—are likely to determine which path the market takes in the coming months.

The post Why Does Asia Keep Buying Bitcoin While Americans Are Selling? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

❌